文献类型：期刊文献

英文题名：A TOPSIS-Based Model for Evaluating the Performance of the Intellectual Property Value Strategies of Science and Technology Enterprises

作者：Lei, Qiuyuan[1];Liu, Cheng[1];Xie, Wenjing[1];Bao, Xinzhong[2]

第一作者：Lei, Qiuyuan

通讯作者：Lei, QY[1]

机构：[1]Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China;[2]Beijing Union Univ, Sch Management, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China

第一机构：Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China

通讯机构：[1]corresponding author), Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China.

年份：2021

卷号：2021

外文期刊名：DISCRETE DYNAMICS IN NATURE AND SOCIETY

收录：;Scopus(收录号：2-s2.0-85121633532);WOS:【SCI-EXPANDED(收录号:WOS:000772899300003)，SSCI(收录号:WOS:000772899300003)】；

基金：AcknowledgmentsThis research was partially supported by Major projects of Beijing Social Science Foundation (no. 20ZDA03). The authors would like to express their gratitude to Edit Springs (https://www.editsprings.com) for the expert linguistic services provided.

语种：英文

摘要：Intellectual property comes with risks such as value evaluation and externalities. It is an intangible asset involving a large investment and a long return period; however, it plays an important role in enhancing the competitiveness of enterprises. Some companies see intellectual property as being a long-term development strategy, which makes evaluating the performance of corporate intellectual property particularly important. The TOPSIS method is widely used to evaluate the pros and cons, as well as the performance of various programs. It can make full use of the data to accurately reflect the gaps in various programs. This paper uses the TOPSIS method to evaluate the performance of the intellectual property value strategy of six typical technology companies based on three dimensions: financial performance, external performance, and value chain performance. The study found that the value chain performance was the most important in the performance evaluation of the intellectual property value strategy, followed by the external performance, and then by the financial performance. There were also significant differences in the intellectual property value strategy of the six technology companies.