登录    注册    忘记密码

详细信息

支架介入治疗颈内动脉狭窄和动脉瘤对动脉瘤壁面压力的影响  ( EI收录)  

Effect on aneurysmal pressure after stent intervention treatment for aneurysm accompanied by stenosis

文献类型:期刊文献

中文题名:支架介入治疗颈内动脉狭窄和动脉瘤对动脉瘤壁面压力的影响

英文题名:Effect on aneurysmal pressure after stent intervention treatment for aneurysm accompanied by stenosis

作者:付文宇[1,2];殷文聪[3];乔爱科[3]

第一作者:付文宇

通讯作者:Fu, W.-Y.

机构:[1]北京联合大学机械与电子工程学院;[2]北京工业大学建筑与工程学院;[3]北京工业大学生命科学与生物工程学院

第一机构:北京联合大学智慧城市学院|北京联合大学机器人学院

通讯机构:[1]College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100020, China|[1141739]北京联合大学机器人学院;[11417]北京联合大学;

年份:2012

卷号:28

期号:5

起止页码:501-504

中文期刊名:医用生物力学

外文期刊名:Journal of Medical Biomechanics

收录:CSTPCD;;EI(收录号:20125015795425);Scopus(收录号:2-s2.0-84870736410);北大核心:【北大核心2011】;CSCD:【CSCD_E2011_2012】;PubMed;

基金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(10972016;81171107);北京市自然科学基金资助项目(3092004)

语种:中文

中文关键词:动脉瘤;狭窄;支架;压力;计算流体动力学

外文关键词:Aneurysm; Stenosis; Stent; Pressure; Computational fluid dynamics(CFD)

摘要:目的研究当狭窄与动脉瘤毗邻时,使用支架介入治疗后对动脉瘤壁面压力产生的影响。方法使用计算流体动力学分析的方法对动脉瘤模型及狭窄和动脉瘤毗邻的模型进行对比研究。构建3个模型(M1、M2、M3)对压力变化进行分析比较。M1是颈内动脉瘤模型(无狭窄、无支架),在M1中的动脉瘤前构造一段狭窄动脉形成M2,在M2的动脉瘤部位植入支架后形成M3。结果 M2、M1两个模型相比较,轻度狭窄(50%)引起的动脉瘤部位的压力增加约为1.369 9 kPa(10.3 mmHg)(收缩期的峰值时刻),一个心动周期内动脉瘤部位的平均压力增加约为0.572 kPa(4.3 mmHg)。M3、M2两个模型相比较,动脉瘤部位的压力增加大约为1.037 kPa(7.8 mmHg)(收缩期的峰值时刻),一个心动周期内动脉瘤部位的平均压力增加大约为0.399 kPa(3 mmHg)。结论当使用支架治疗狭窄与弯曲颅内动脉瘤毗邻的患者时,轻度狭窄不会导致显著压力增加。载瘤动脉的形状、动脉瘤或动脉狭窄疾病确实对动脉瘤部位压力变化有影响。
Objective To investigate the effect on aneurysmal pressure after stent intervention treatment for aneurysm accompanied by stenosis.Methods Computational fluid dynamics(CFD) analyses were carried out to make comparative study on aneurysm models with and without stenosis.Three models(M1,M2,M3) were constructed to compare the pressure variations.M1 was the aneurysm model with no stenosis and no stent,M2 was forming from M1 model with a preaneurysm stenosis,and M3 was the M2 model with stent implantation at the place of the aneurysm.Results For comparison between M2 and M1,pressure increase in the aneurismal sac caused by a mild stenosis(50%) was about 1.399 9 kPa(10.3 mmHg) with the peak systole,and the average pressure increase in a cardiac cycle was about 0.572 kPa(4.3 mmHg).For comparison between M2 and M3,pressure increase in the aneurismal sac was about 1.037 kPa(7.8 mmHg) at peak systole in a cardiac cycle,and the average pressure increase in the aneurismal sac in a cardiac cycle was about 0.399 kPa(3 mmHg).Conclusions A mild stenosis could not result in the sharp pressure increase with stent intervention applied to the treatment of aneurysm accompanied by stenosis harbored on a tortuous intracranial artery.The geometry of the parent vessel and its aneurysmal/stenotic diseases do have influence on the pressure variation at the place of aneurysm.

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

版权所有©北京联合大学 重庆维普资讯有限公司 渝B2-20050021-8 
渝公网安备 50019002500408号 违法和不良信息举报中心