文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：“法理台独”理论根源之批判

英文题名：Criticism of the Theoretical Source of"Jurisprudent Independence of Taiwan"

作者：朱松岭[1];许崇德[2];易赛键[3]

第一作者：朱松岭

机构：[1]北京联合大学台湾研究院;[2]中国人民大学法学院;[3]<求是>杂志社政治编辑部

第一机构：北京联合大学台湾研究院|北京联合大学台湾研究所

年份：2010

期号：3

起止页码：7-15

中文期刊名：福建师范大学学报：哲学社会科学版

收录：人大复印报刊资料;CSTPCD;;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2008】；CSSCI:【CSSCI2010_2011】；

基金：国家社科基金"法理台独及其对两岸关系彩响的评估研究"的阶段性研究成果(项目编号:078Zz010)

语种：中文

中文关键词：法理台独;台湾地位未定论;自决论;台独分子

外文关键词：Jurisprudent Independence of Taiwan, the undetermined status of Taiwan, self-determination

摘要："法理台独"是在特殊的国际背景、两岸关系发展的特殊轨道以及台湾经历政治变迁的特殊时期发展起来的一种政治理念。学界普遍认为,"法理台独"的基础理论主要是"台湾地位未定论"、"台湾民族论"、"住民自决论"、"中国主权观念过时论"、"台湾命运共同体论"等。本文将"法理台独"的理论根源归纳为实体论、程序论和方法论,从根源上分析并批评"法理台独",击其要害、正本清源,从而寻求破解"法理台独"之道。
The emergence of Jurisprudent Independence of Taiwan is against the special international background, the special trail of the development of the relations between Taiwan Straits and the peculiar period during which Taiwan has experienced its political changes. Scholars, in a uniform way, think that the theoretical basis of Jurisprudent Independence of Taiwan is mainly the following arguments： the undetermined status of Taiwan, the theory of Taiwan nationality, the self- determination by the inhabitants, theories of the outdatedness of China＇ s sovereignty, theories about the commonwealth of Taiwan＇ s fate, and so on. This easy generalizes the theory of Jurisprudent Independence of Taiwan to its substantialism, its procedure and its methodology, aiming at the criticism of its theoretical sources, seeking for a real picture, so that we could reveal the fragility of the theory. Due to the limited space, its methodology is not to be discussed here.