登录    注册    忘记密码

详细信息

焦菊隐的“心象”术语与斯氏体系关系的再辨析    

On the Relationship between Jiao Juyin’s“Xin Xiang”and Stanislavski System

文献类型:期刊文献

中文题名:焦菊隐的“心象”术语与斯氏体系关系的再辨析

英文题名:On the Relationship between Jiao Juyin’s“Xin Xiang”and Stanislavski System

作者:罗琦[1]

第一作者:罗琦

机构:[1]北京联合大学艺术学院

第一机构:北京联合大学艺术学院

年份:2020

期号:6

起止页码:15-34

中文期刊名:戏剧:中央戏剧学院学报

收录:CSTPCD;;北大核心:【北大核心2017】;CSSCI:【CSSCI_E2019_2020】;

基金:国家社科基金艺术学一般项目“北京人民艺术剧院演出史研究”(项目编号:15BB028)的阶段性成果。

语种:中文

中文关键词:心象;意象;角色的胚胎;内心视象;性格化

外文关键词:Xin Xiang;image;role embryo;inner images;characterization

摘要:本文将焦菊隐的"心象"术语从"心象"学说中剥离出来,对历来关于"心象"与"内心视象""性格化"内在关系的重要观点进行梳理,辨析其中合理、疏漏或谬误之处。根据斯氏著作相关内容,澄清"心象"术语的内涵与外延,进一步厘清上述三个术语之间的关系;探究焦菊隐在不同阶段,对斯氏体系"内心视象""性格化"术语不同的理解,追溯其为何将这两个术语贯通并置,应用于"心象"方法中的原因与动机。
This article differentiates the term“Xin Xiang”by Jiao Juyin from his theory about Xin Xiang,which is“image”in literal translation.Besides,the crucial opinions concerning the internal relationships among“Xin Xiang”,“inner images”and“characterization”are analysed,so that the rationality,omissions and fallacies are exposed.Based on Stanislavski’s related works,the connotation and the denotation of the term“Xin Xiang”are defined and the relationships between“Xin Xiang”,“inner vision”and“characterization”are clarified further.Then,the issues are studied about Jiao Juyin’s different understanding and adaptation of“inner images”and“characterization”borrowed from Stanislavski system in his different acting phases.Moreover,his mastery of the two terms“inner images”and“characterization”,and the reason as well as his motivation of applying them into“Xin Xiang”method are discussed.

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

版权所有©北京联合大学 重庆维普资讯有限公司 渝B2-20050021-8 
渝公网安备 50019002500408号 违法和不良信息举报中心