文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：近十年我国旅游学术共同体成果的h指数测度与评价

英文题名：Evaluating the Research Performances of Tourism Academic Communities of China in the Past Ten Years Using the h Index

作者：张凌云[1,2];齐飞[3];吴平[2]

第一作者：张凌云

机构：[1]西南财经大学工商管理学院;[2]北京联合大学旅游学院;[3]中国社会科学院研究生院

第一机构：西南财经大学工商管理学院,四川成都610074

年份：2014

卷号：29

期号：6

起止页码：14-23

中文期刊名：旅游学刊

外文期刊名：Tourism Tribune

收录：人大复印报刊资料;CSTPCD;;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;社科基金资助期刊;CSSCI:【CSSCI2014_2016】；

基金：国家社科基金重点项目(13AJY016)资助~~

语种：中文

中文关键词：旅游;学术共同体;h指数;学术评价;排序

外文关键词：tourism; tourism academic community; h index; academic evaluation; ranking

摘要：h指数是一项评价科学家科研绩效的定量指标，一个人的h指数越高，表明他的论文影响力越大。文章对2003-2012年我国旅游学术共同体（学术期刊、旅游研究者、高等院校及科研机构等）的旅游研究成果应用h指数进行测度和评价。h指数的计算兼顾了论文的数量和质量，弥补了单纯以论文数量来测度和评价学术共同体成员（如学术期刊、研究者和学术机构等）成果学术影响力和贡献度的不足，增加了旅游学术影响力的评价维度，较为全面客观地反映了我国旅游学术共同体成员的科研生产力和学术影响力，更为全面客观地测度和评价了近十年来我国旅游学术研究的概貌和特征，对旅游学术共同体成员成果进行了评价和排序。
The h index is a quantitative tool for evaluating scientists＇ research performance. The higher a person＇ s h index, the greater the influence of his or her article is. This paper uses the h index method to evaluate the academic articles published by tourism academic communities in China （i.e., academic journals, tourism scholars, universities, research institutions, etc.） from 2003 to 2013. The sources used in this paper were retrieved from three databases： Chinese Science Citation Database （CSCD）, China National Knowledge Infrastructure （CNKI）, and Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index （CSSCI）. A total of 784 academic journals, 16,024 articles, 13,608 authors, and 2,565 research institutions were chosen in the analysis. The sample is the same as the one used in the authors＇ previous paper entitled Development Pattern, Classification and Evaluation of the Tourism Academic Community in China in the Last Ten Years： From the Perspective of Big Data of Articles of Tourism Academic Journals for the purpose of comparison. By comparing the advantages and disadvantages of the methods used by tourism researchers to measure the h index, this paper proposes a comprehensive method to calculate the h index of individual journals, authors, and institutions. For academic journals, the h indices of the top 110 journals were above 9, and Tourism Tribune was ranked No. 1 based on its h index （88）. During the period of 2003 and 2012, of 1944 papers published, 88 papers were cited not less than 88 times. Human Geography and Economic Geography were ranked Nos. 2 and 3 with h indices of 51 and 48, respectively. For authors, BAO Jigang, WU Bihu, and LU Lin were the top three based on the h indices of 19, 18, and 17, respectively. For institutions, h indices of 104 institutions were above 4, and the top three were Sun Yat-Sen University, Anbui Normal University, and Peking University. Additionally, the research teams of most of the top seven institutions were geography-oriented. This indicates that the discipline of geography occupies a dominant position in tourism studies. The h index method takes both the quantity and quality of journals, researchers, and articles into consideration, making up the deficiency of traditional methods that use the quantity of articles as the only measure for evaluating academic performance. In addition, the h index method can help to reflect the research productivity and academic impact of tourism academic communities objectively. Furthermore, the evaluation of the research performances of the tourism research communities in China can help Chinese researchers to open their minds and participate more in international academic communications and can also help researchers from overseas develop an overall understanding of the up-to-date research development of Chinese tourism academic communities.