文献类型：期刊文献

英文题名：THE GAME OF INTERESTS IN CHINA'S UNIFIED CARBON MARKET: A PERSPECTIVE OF SUSTAINABILITY

作者：Zhang, Tingting[1];Wang, Ling[2];Chen, Hua[2]

第一作者：Zhang, Tingting

通讯作者：Chen, H[1]

机构：[1]Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China;[2]Beijing Union Univ, Business Coll, Beijing 100025, Peoples R China

第一机构：Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China

通讯机构：[1]corresponding author), Beijing Union Univ, Business Coll, Beijing 100025, Peoples R China.|[1141721]北京联合大学商务学院;[11417]北京联合大学;

年份：2020

卷号：19

期号：9

起止页码：1535-1541

外文期刊名：ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL

收录：;Scopus(收录号：2-s2.0-85096987048);WOS:【SCI-EXPANDED(收录号:WOS:000589382100009)】；

基金：The authors are grateful for the financial support provided by Beijing Society Science Fund Project (16YJB015), Premium Funding Project for Academic Human Resources Development in Beijing Union University (BPHR2017CS07) and Beijing Top Discipline Construction Project.

语种：英文

外文关键词：Carbon trading market; income distribution; multiple risk factors

摘要：China is currently promoting the construction of a nationwide unified carbon trading market. Theoretically, a unified carbon trading market can play a role in improving the efficiency of carbon trading. However, in the process of transformation from decentralized and pilot carbon trading platforms to a unified national one, the individual differentiation of market participant's increases and risks are different. It is the core issue to ensure more sustainable and healthier development for the unified carbon market to make fair and reasonable income distribution for market participants with differences.The paper uses the Shapley value method to allocate the cooperative benefits in the carbon trade market and then introduces the diversified risk factors borne by participants in the carbon trade market to revise the results of income distributing. The results show that the allocation mechanism considering multiple risk factors is more fair and reasonable. The research results can provide reference for policy making about how to improve the enthusiasm of market participants in the national unified carbon market and promote the sustainable development of the carbon trading market.