文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：贝格拉姆宝藏中的非罗马玻璃器

作者：林怡娴[1]

第一作者：林怡娴

机构：[1]北京联合大学应用文理学院

第一机构：北京联合大学应用文理学院

年份：2018

卷号：0

期号：1

起止页码：189-199

中文期刊名：南方文物

外文期刊名：Cultural Relics in Southern China

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2017】；CSSCI:【CSSCI_E2017_2018】；

基金：2016年度教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地课题《早期丝绸之路东西文化交流的考古学研究》(项目批准号16JJD780010)的阶段性成果

语种：中文

中文关键词：贝格拉姆宝藏;非罗马玻璃器;缠丝;学术史

外文关键词：Begram treasure;Non-Roman glass;trailing;academic history

摘要：阿富汗贝格拉姆宝藏中的鱼形玻璃器皿长期以来被作为罗马玻璃器的参照物比定我国辽宁北票北燕冯素弗墓出土的鸭形注。然而．诚如Whitehouse多次指出．贝格拉姆所见鱼形器及另外两类器物皆非罗马玻璃。它们的共性在于以过度和生硬的缠丝装饰自成风格：尽管它们在器形上与罗马玻璃嚣存在相似之处，但这一风格却与罗马玻璃器存在显著差别、一些学者通过分析《厄立特里亚航海记》提出它们是在罗马帝国生产但在帝国以外加工成型，以试图调和其化学成分与外观特征的矛盾之处。本文即从学术史角度梳理不同观点．指出贝格拉姆这些非罗马玻璃器的来源问题依旧存疑。
The glass vessels in the form of fish in the Begram treasure had long been regarded as Roman paralles to the duck-shaped vessel from the tomb of Feng Sufu of the Northern Yan Kingdom in Beipiao, Liaoning. However, these fish-shaped items as well as the other two groups of glass vessles from Begram are not from the Roman world as David Whitehouse argued for many times. All of the above three categories of glass have a common denominator of exuberant and ponderous trailing, which is unique and definitely distinguishs them from Roman glass, albeit typoligical resemblances to the latter could be observed obviously. As to reconcile their ＂Roman＂ composition with ＂non-Roman＂ style, some scholars suggested that they might be made in the Roman Empire while worked somewhere else according to the Periplus of the Erythraean Sea. By tracing the details of academic history of the non- Roman glasses from Begram, this paper deomonstrates that the prevous provenancing of them is not conclusive.