文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：中国对“一带一路”沿线国家能源投资的经济与环境效应研究

英文题名：The Economic and Environmental Impacts of China’s Energy Investment on Countries along the “Belt and Road”

作者：张金珠[1];赵欣[2];刘宇[3,4];田园[2]

第一作者：张金珠

机构：[1]北京林业大学经济管理学院,北京100083;[2]北京联合大学商务学院,北京100025;[3]中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院,北京100190;[4]中国科学院大学公共政策与管理学院,北京100049

第一机构：北京林业大学经济管理学院,北京100083

年份：2021

卷号：17

期号：1

起止页码：42-51

中文期刊名：科技促进发展

外文期刊名：Science & Technology for Development

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库

基金：2019年北京市教委社科计划一般项目(SM202011417010):京津冀城市群的城市蔓延与生态效率互动机制研究,负责人:田园;2019年国家林业和草原局软科学项目:促进北京循环经济发展的对策研究:以林下经济为例,负责人:田园。

语种：中文

中文关键词：能源投资;经济效益;环境影响;一带一路;MRIO

外文关键词：energy investment;economic benefits;environmental impact;Belt and Road;MRIO

摘要：随着中国与"一带一路"沿线国家能源合作项目的推进,经济增长与生态环境之间的矛盾也日益凸显。为全面准确地分析中国能源投资对东道国经济增长和碳排放量的影响,本文将"一带一路"沿线国家划分为六大板块,并在每个板块中各选出一个代表国家,然后运用全球多区域投入产出(Multiregional Input Output Model, MRIO)模型,实证分析中国在"一带一路"沿线国家的能源投资对东道国各部门的总产出完全拉动量、增加值拉动量、二氧化碳排放拉动量的影响。研究结论表明,相较于对生态环境造成的负面影响而言,能源投资给沿线国家带来的经济增长效应更为可观,且经济和环境的成本收益呈现出较大的区域异质性。其中,对俄罗斯的能源投资效率较高,而印度尼西亚的成本收益值则较小。本研究可以为客观地评估我国能源投资的经济收益和环境成本,促进能源投资结构的绿色低碳转型提供有益参考。
With the promotion of China’s energy cooperation with the countries along the "Belt and Road", the contradiction between economic growth and ecological environment is increasingly prominent. In order to comprehensively and accurately analyze the impact of China’s energy investment on the economic growth and carbon emissions of the host countries, this paper divides the countries along the "Belt and Road" into six major areas, and select a representative country in each area. Then the global multi-regional input-output(MRIO) model is used to empirically analyze the impact of China’s energy investment on the total output, added value and carbon dioxide emissions in countries along the "Belt and Road". The results show that compared with the negative impact on the environment, the positive economic growth effect of energy investment on the host countries is more significant. The economic and environmental cost-benefit indicator shows great regional heterogeneity. China’s energy investment in Russia is more efficient, while Indonesia’s cost-benefit value is smaller. This study can provide policy reference for objectively evaluating the economic benefits and environmental impact of China’s OFDI on the countries along the "Belt and Road" and promoting the green and low-carbon transition of energy investment.