文献类型：期刊文献

英文题名：Heterogeneous choices of environmental strategies for heavily polluting firms under institutional pressure in China

作者：Wang, Sen[1];Yin, Jianhua[2];Zhu, Xiaomei[1]

通讯作者：Yin, JH[1]

机构：[1]Beijing Union Univ, Management Coll, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China;[2]Univ Int Business & Econ, Business Sch, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China

第一机构：北京联合大学管理学院

通讯机构：[1]corresponding author), Univ Int Business & Econ, Business Sch, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China.

年份：2022

卷号：29

期号：5

起止页码：7614-7626

外文期刊名：ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH

收录：;EI(收录号：20242616371510);Scopus(收录号：2-s2.0-85114092460);WOS:【SCI-EXPANDED(收录号:WOS:000692082700004)】；

基金：This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 72002013, No. 71874029), Project of Beijing Municipal Education Commission (No. SM202111417005), and Academic Research Projects of Beijing Union University (No. XP202010, No. SK40202101, No. JS10202005).

语种：英文

外文关键词：Environmental strategy; Policy pressure; Public pressure; Organisational slack; Asset specificity

摘要：The question of how organisations choose their environmental strategy remains an unsolved problem in institutional theory. We argue that institutional pressure and the characteristics of the firm affect choices around environmental strategies. An empirical analysis of 597 heavily polluting firms indicates that more firms choose environmental leadership strategies, which means that they actively work with upstream and downstream firms to reduce emissions, when government pressure is the greatest; however, more companies are likely to choose pollution prevention strategies, which implies recycling materials in the production process is implemented, when public pressure is the greatest. Finally, organisations with more redundant resources and strong asset specificity are more prone to choose environmental leadership strategies as policy pressure or public pressure increases. The findings offer a decision-making framework to promote environmental measures related to government policy formulation and public participation. The results can also provide empirical evidence to guide environmental strategic choices for heavily polluting enterprises.