文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：农业文化遗产地旅游社区利益关系网络治理研究——以XN省HN梯田两个典型旅游村为例

英文题名：The Network Governance on Interests Relationship in the Tourism Community of Agricultural Cultural Heritage Sites——Based on two typical tourism villages in HN Rice Terraces in XN Province

作者：时少华[1];孙业红[1]

第一作者：时少华

机构：[1]北京联合大学旅游学院

第一机构：北京联合大学旅游学院

年份：2017

卷号：32

期号：4

起止页码：48-63

中文期刊名：四川理工学院学报：社会科学版

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;CSSCI:【CSSCI_E2017_2018】；

基金：教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(14YJCZH129);国家自然科学基金项目(41201580);北京市社会科学基金项目(15JGC164);国家旅游局科研项目(16TACG014);国家旅游局旅游业青年专家培养计划项目(TYETP201507)

语种：中文

中文关键词：农业文化遗产地;旅游社区;利益关系;网络治理;HN梯田;旅游村落

外文关键词：agricultural cultural heritage site; tourism community; interest relationship; network governance; HN Rice Terraces; tourism village

摘要：旅游社区各利益相关者之间的利益平衡和矛盾治理问题是影响农业文化遗产地可持续旅游发展的重要问题。目前从社会网络视角探讨农业遗产地社区利益相关者关系网络及其利益协调的研究还很少见。通过对XN省HN梯田两个典型的旅游社区——Y村与Z村的考察,运用社会网络分析方法,进行网络紧密度、互惠性、核心边缘、传递性及中间人分析,得出以下结论:第一,Y村的利益网络密度低于Z村,而Y村集团内部与集团间的紧密度等于或低于Z村;第二,两村的利益网络互惠性较高且差异不大,各利益集团内部均高于(或等于)集团间的互惠性(Y村的压力集团除外);第三,两村利益网络存在明显的核心边缘结构,导致两村(尤其是Z村)具有利益控制集团,对边缘利益集团具有较明显的支配作用,导致利益分配不公平;第四,两村利益网络具有高重叠传递性特征,导致两村利益网络中存在冗余的利益关系,呈现利益传递过程的低效性;第五,需要对两村的利益协调人、利益代理人、利益守门人、利益联络人等角色进行培养。依据结论,治理建议总结如下:第一,需要增强Y村社区内部及与其它利益集团的紧密度;第二,要提升利益网络中边缘集团的网络凝聚力,政府在利益分配、经营管理中要找准自己的角色定位;第三,需要去除一些网络中的无效关系,并加强各派系之间的有效关联;第四,要培育遗产地四个利益集团之间的中介人角色;第五,建立新的网络多主体共同参与的利益网络治理模式。以尊重劳动,激励居民通过各种智力与非智力劳动来创造幸福,从而提升生活质量。
Interest dispute among stakeholders in the process of tourism community at Agricultural Cultural Heritage sites is still a big problem for policy makers and it has become a significant factor hindering the sustainable development of tourism at those sites. At present, the study on relationship network and interest coordination of stakeholders of agricultural heritage sites from the perspective of SNA is still very rare. Taking two villages of HN Rice Terraces in XN as an example, using social network analysis method, through the network density, reciprocity, core and periphery, transitivity, and broker analysis, this paper draws the conclusion as follows： first, the overall interests network density of Y village is lower than that of Z village, the density inside and between groups of Y village group is equal to or lower than that of Z village. Second,interest network reciprocity of two village is relatively high and the difference is not big; the reciprocity of intra-groups is higher than（or equal to） that between groups（except for the pressure group of Y village）. Third,the interests network of two villages has obviously core and periphery structure, as a result, two villages（especially Z village） have interests control group and have a significant control effect on periphery interests,leading to unfair profit distribution. Fourth, interests network of two villages has high overlapping transitivity characteristics and redundant interest relationship exists between two villages, showing the inefficiency of interests transmission process. Fifth, it is necessary to cultivate the interests coordinator, interest agent,gatekeeper and interest contact person of the two villages. Based on the conclusion, the paper puts forward the following suggestions： First, strengthen the density between Y village community and other interest groups.Second, promote cohesion of edge group in the network and the government should find out its role and positioning in the interest distribution, operation and management. Third, remove some invalid relationship in the network and strengthen the effective connection between factions. Fourth, cultivate intermediary role between four interest groups at heritage site. Fifth, build a new governance mode of interest network with mulit-bodies participation.