文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：京杭运河非物质文化遗产旅游价值及评价研究

英文题名：The Evaluation,Protection and Utilization of Tourism Resource Values of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of the Beijing-Hangzhou Canal

作者：时少华[1];聂延涛[2];孙媛媛[1]

第一作者：时少华

机构：[1]北京联合大学旅游学院,北京100001;[2]北京联合大学应用科技学院,北京100012

第一机构：北京联合大学旅游学院

年份：2023

卷号：15

期号：5

起止页码：30-42

中文期刊名：旅游研究

外文期刊名：Tourism Research

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库

基金：国家社会科学基金艺术学项目“京杭运河传统村落非物质文化遗产活态保护传承与旅游融合发展研究”(20BH151);北京市教育委员会科学研究计划项目;北京市社科基金项目“文旅融合视野下北京地区大运河传统村镇民俗文化活态保护传承研究”(SZ202311417024/22GJB024);北京学研究基地开放课题“北京大运河文化带旅游资源游憩价值评估及保护利用研究”(BJXJD-KT2019-YB03)。

语种：中文

中文关键词：京杭运河;非物质文化遗产;旅游价值;价值评价

外文关键词：Beijing-Hangzhou Canal;intangible cultural heritage;tourism values;value evaluation

摘要：京杭运河作为一种特殊的非物质文化遗产,其旅游价值评价是运河非遗利用的重要依据。基于已有研究,提出京杭运河非物质文化遗产的内涵与旅游价值,运用AHP法和定性评价法对京杭运河非遗旅游价值进行整体和分类综合评价。研究发现:从要素层看,观赏游憩价值和历史文化价值是旅游价值的核心;从各指标层看,参与性、历史性、发展潜力、文化效益、保护传承与保护参与性价值权重最高;从总权重分布看,参与性、历史性、观赏性和游憩性四个指标在运河非遗旅游价值评价体系中权重较高;从运河四类非遗看,在指标层面与整体研究结论略有不同。基于此,提出了五个方面建议。
As a special heritage,the tourism value evaluation of the Beijing-Hangzhou Canal Intangible Cultural Heritage is an important basis for the utilization of the canal's intangible cultural heritage.Based on the previous literature,the connotation and tourism value of the intangible cultural heritage of the Beijing-Hangzhou Canal are proposed,and the AHP method and the qualitative evaluation method are used to evaluate the intangible cultural heritage value of the Beijing-Hangzhou Canal as a whole and classify,and it is found:from the perspective of the factor layer,ornamental recreation value and historical and cultural value are the core of tourism value;from the perspective of each indicator level,participation,historicity,development potential,cultural benefits,protection inheritance and protection of participatory value weights are the highest;from the perspective of the total weight distribution,the four indicators of participation,historicity,ornamentation,and recreation have higher weights in the evaluation system of the tourism value of canal intangible cultural heritage;from the perspective of the four types of canal intangible cultural heritage,it is slightly different from the overall research conclusion at the index level.Based on the conclusion,five suggestions are put forward.