文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：旅游社区灾害风险认知的差异性研究——以哈尼梯田两类社区为例

英文题名：Study on the Differences of Disaster Risk Cognition in the Tourism Community: A Case of Two Types Community of Hani Rice Terraces

作者：孙业红[1];周洪建[2];魏云洁[1]

第一作者：孙业红

机构：[1]北京联合大学旅游学院;[2]民政部国家减灾中心

第一机构：北京联合大学旅游学院

年份：2015

卷号：30

期号：12

起止页码：46-54

中文期刊名：旅游学刊

外文期刊名：Tourism Tribune

收录：人大复印报刊资料;CSTPCD;;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2014】；社科基金资助期刊;CSSCI:【CSSCI2014_2016】；

基金：国家自然科学青年基金项目"农业文化遗产地旅游社区灾害风险认知及适应过程研究:以云南红河为例"(41201580)资助~~

语种：中文

中文关键词：风险认知;自然灾害;差异性;旅游社区;哈尼梯田

外文关键词：risk cognition;natural disaster;differences;tourism community;Hani Terrace

摘要：文章以云南元阳县两类社区(3个)深度访谈与半结构性问卷调查数据为基础,分析旅游社区灾害风险认知的差异性,结果表明:(1)在梯田作为农业文化遗产地核心旅游吸引物的前提下,可视化的非物质文化遗产资源(民族歌舞与传统服饰)、收入与就业机会增加、外来投资增长和传统文化保护是区分旅游社区与非旅游社区的主要指标。(2)与非旅游社区相比,旅游社区灾害风险总体认知水平相对更高,对灾害(风险)也更为敏感,其遭受灾害的损失可能更大,旅游社区居民更愿意主动适应灾害(风险)。(3)"压力-状态-响应"(PSR)框架可以较好地解释农业文化遗产地旅游社区灾害风险认知的差异性。该文可为指导旅游社区灾害风险认知与适应行为的理性互动提供依据。
This study chose the disaster risk cognition as the research topic, taking the site of Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems, Hani Terraces in Yuanyang County, Yunnan province in southwestern China as an example. On the basis of in- depth interviews and semi- structured questionnaire survey data in three villages of two types community（tourism community, non- tourism community） of Yuanyang County, this paper analyzed differences of disaster risk cognition between two types of community and in the tourism community. With the framework of pressure-state-response（PSR）, this paper proposed the conceptual model of relationship between disaster risk cognition and adaption behavior in the tourism community and non- tourism community. The result showed that：（1）On the premise of terraced land as the core tourism attraction of agricultural heritage, there were several main indicators to distinguish between tourism community（Tugezhai and Mengpin） and nontourism community（Quanfuzhuang）, which were visualization intangible cultural heritage resources（including folk dance and traditional costumes）, increased income and employment opportunities,increased foreign investment and traditional culture protection. The possibility of traditional natural scenery, green agriculture products and national customs as the indicator has been excluded.（2）Compared to the non- tourism community, overall disaster risk cognition level of people in tourism community was relatively higher, for example cumulative answer ratio of six kinds of local main natural hazards（drought, mountain flash flood, landslide, debris flow, earthquake and low temperature disaster） in Mengpin is 145%, while 80% in Quanfuzhuang. Respondents in tourism community were more sensitive to disaster risk due to the more types of hazard-affected bodies（HAB）, more wide scope of HAB spatial distribution and more high value of HABs under the tourism development, who suffered disaster losses and potential losses might be greater. As for forest and water, 93% of respondents in Mengpin considered terrace may be affected by all kinds of hazards, and 67% of Quanfuzhuang expressed the same opinion. Two types community presented obvious differences in worries about the extent of the damage in terraces, forest and water. While people in Quanfuzhuang did not show the unwarranted worries about it. Residents of tourism community were more willing to take the imitative to adapt to disasters risk due to the higher sensitivities and more severe potential losses. More than 60% interviewees in both Tugezhai and Mengpin were willing to take active adaptation measures（e.g.diversifying the income resources, adjusting the crop structure, engaging in tourism development and so on）, while the rate of Quanfuzhuang is relative lower, 48%.（3） PSR framework can be used to explain the differences of disaster risk cognition of tourism community in agricultural heritage sites.