详细信息
论庭审实质化的体系化构建——以“顾雏军案”再审为例
Analysis on Systematically Making Criminal Trials Substantial ——Taking the Retrial of Gu Chujun Case as An Example
文献类型:期刊文献
中文题名:论庭审实质化的体系化构建——以“顾雏军案”再审为例
英文题名:Analysis on Systematically Making Criminal Trials Substantial ——Taking the Retrial of Gu Chujun Case as An Example
作者:李晓丽[1]
第一作者:李晓丽
机构:[1]北京联合大学应用文理学院
第一机构:北京联合大学应用文理学院
年份:2019
卷号:0
期号:6
起止页码:89-97
中文期刊名:浙江工商大学学报
外文期刊名:Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University
收录:国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2017】;CSSCI:【CSSCI2019_2020】;
基金:国家社会科学基金项目(18BFX137)
语种:中文
中文关键词:庭审实质化;庭前会议;直接言词审理原则;公正审判;体系化构建
外文关键词:making criminal trials substantial;pre-trial meeting;principle of direct and verbal trial;fair trial;systematic construction
摘要:落实庭审实质化是实现以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革目标的关键,是对复杂刑事案件进行公正审判的必要条件。"顾雏军案"的再审纠错过程,体现了庭前会议制度的运用与直接言词审理原则的贯彻对于体系化构建庭审实质化的重要作用,为实现复杂刑事案件的公正审判带来了诸多有益启示。庭审实质化的实现,不仅需要完善庭前会议制度以及直接言词审理原则的相关制度,更需要刑事诉讼办案人员提升执业素养与办案理念。
Making criminal trials substantial is the key factor of "Trial-Cemtered Process Reform" and indispensable condition for fair trial in complex criminal cases. The retrial of Gu Chujun case demonstrates the crucial significance of both pre-trial meeting and the principle of direct and verbal trial on systematically making criminal trial substantial, which provides valuable enlightenment to fair trial of complex criminal cases. To make criminal trials substantial, not only the regulations of pre-trial meeting and the principle of direct and verbal trial shall be improved, but also the professional literacy and litigation notion shall be promoted.
参考文献:
正在载入数据...