文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：海洋维权的博弈问题

英文题名：Game Theory Analysis of Marine Rights Protection

作者：王磊[1];陈华[2];康美泽[3];马晓川[1]

第一作者：王磊

机构：[1]中国科学院声学研究所,北京100190;[2]北京联合大学商务学院,北京100025;[3]中国舰船研究设计中心,武汉430064

第一机构：中国科学院声学研究所,北京100190

年份：2019

卷号：21

期号：6

起止页码：80-86

中文期刊名：中国工程科学

外文期刊名：Strategic Study of CAE

收录：CSTPCD;;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2017】；CSCD:【CSCD2019_2020】；

基金：中国工程院咨询项目“海洋强国战略研究2035”(2018-ZD-08)。

语种：中文

中文关键词：海洋维权;博弈;海上维权技术;《联合国海洋法公约》

外文关键词：marine rights protection;game theory;marine rights protection technology;United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea

摘要：本文以博弈论观点探讨海洋维权问题,包括海洋维权在处理海洋争端中的作用和地位,我国海洋维权博弈的性质、方向及博弈要素。当前阶段,推动海洋维权博弈微观化、事务性处理,从维权斗争向联合管治方向发展符合我国的国家利益。将作为海洋维权“斗争前线”的海上维权区分为“争议海区进入”“渔船越界维权”“非合作渔业博弈模型”3类基本博弈过程,分别开展博弈分析,据此研判我国海上维权力量建设的重点方向。研究表明:提高海洋产业科技水平、发展维权技术手段可以有效改变博弈收益,从而实现有利的博弈均衡;发展高技术干扰手段、水下防护技术、海洋广域监视技术和远海渔业开发技术,是在重复博弈过程中获得优势地位的重要保障。
This study discusses marine rights protection from the perspective of game theory.It introduces the role of marine rights protection in handling marine disputes,as well as the nature,direction,and elements of the game in China’s marine rights protection.Currently,to minimize marine disputes through the game theory and pursue joint governance accord with China’s national interest.To this end,this study categorizes marine rights protection into three basic game processes,i.e.,entry to disputed sea areas,cross-border operation by fishing boats,and non-cooperative fishing,and then conducts corresponding game analysis to determine the key directions for building the marine right protection force of China.It is concluded that improving technological means for marine rights protection can effectively change the game revenue and achieve a beneficial game equilibrium.In particular,the development of technologies for high-tech interference,underwater protection,marine wide-area surveillance,and remote sea fishery development can assist China to gain an advantageous position in repeated game processes.