文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：2003—2020年我国旅游学术共同体学术评价

英文题名：Evaluating the Research Performances of Tourism Academic Communities of China from 2003 to 2020

作者：无[1];《旅游学刊》编辑部[2];乔向杰[1,3];张斌[3];黄倩[4];黄晓波[4];陈岩英[4];张凌云[3]

第一作者：无

机构：[1]中国旅游研究院旅游学术评价研究基地;[2]不详;[3]北京联合大学旅游学院;[4]集美大学工商管理学院旅游系

第一机构：中国旅游研究院旅游学术评价研究基地

年份：2022

卷号：37

期号：3

起止页码：134-148

中文期刊名：旅游学刊

外文期刊名：Tourism Tribune

收录：CSTPCD;;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;社科基金资助期刊;北大核心:【北大核心2020】；CSSCI:【CSSCI2021_2022】；

语种：中文

中文关键词：旅游;学术评价;学术共同体;h指数;g指数

外文关键词：tourism;academic evaluation;academic community;h index;g index

摘要：通过与旅游相关的50个检索词在中国知网中文核心期刊数据库、CSSCI数据库和CSCD数据库中检索出2003—2020年收录的旅游类学术期刊文章,经查重和筛选最终得到30005篇旅游学术论文,以此作为研究样本。样本涉及1143种学术刊物、4220所机构以及25853名作者。研究发现:(1)2003—2020年旅游类论文和刊载论文的学术期刊数量都呈现出较大的增长,地理学刊物继续保持着显著的优势地位;(2)就机构旅游学术成果产出和影响力看,陕西师范大学、中山大学和安徽师范大学依旧保持了各自的优势;(3)从高等院校的排行榜上看,并非综合实力越强的院校旅游科研实力越强;(4)中国科学院、中国社会科学院和中国旅游研究院等3个科研院所在旅游学术研究中也占有一席之地;(5)我国旅游学术共同体已经开启了代际更替进程;(6)女性学者论文的质量(影响力)比数量贡献更大。
Three Chinese core journal databases CNKI,CSSCI and CSCD,were searched to capture previously published research in refereed academic journals from 2003 to 2020.Fifty terms related to tourism were used as search terms.After a practical screen,duplicates were excluded and a total of 30005 academic papers were obtained and used as the research sample.The sample involved 1143 academic journals,4220 universities/institutions,and 25853 authors.The results showed as follows.Firstly,from 2003 to 2020,the number of both tourism papers and academic journals that publish these papers increased significantly.In terms of the number and influence of the journals,geographical journals continued to maintain their leading positions.Secondly,in terms of the academic outputs and influence,Shaanxi Normal University,Sun Yat-sen University and Anhui Normal University continued to maintain their respective dominant positions.In addition,some normal universities exhibited their strength in doing tourism research.These universities,in addition to the above mentioned two,included Nanjing Normal University,East China Normal University,Shanghai Normal University,and South China Normal University,etc.Thirdly,based on the ranking of the universities,it can be seen that universities with comprehensive strength did not necessary have advantages in tourism research.In fact,most of the“double first-class”universities(with the exception of Sun Yat-sen University)named by the Ministry of Education of China,did not show great advantages.On the contrary,some universities with general comprehensive strength excelled in their tourism research achievements,and some surpassed some“double first-class”universities in both the number and influence of publications.Fourthly,three research institutes,the Chinese Academy of Sciences,the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,and the China Tourism Research Institute,also held a place in tourism academic research.Fifthly,in terms of the age structure of the authors,the proportion of middle-aged scholars over 45 years old(born after 1977)showed a steady increase,and they have gradually become the major force of tourism academic research.The China’s tourism academic community has entered the process of generational turnover.Finally,in terms of the gender of the authors,the proportion of female scholars was relatively low in both this edition and the previous two editions.In terms of the contribution to the tourism academic community,the quality(influence)of female scholars’papers was greater than their quantitative contribution.