文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：农户视角下农业文化遗产地生态产品的旅游价值实现路径——以广东潮州单丛茶文化系统为例

英文题名：Value realization paths of ecological products through tourism in agricultural heritage sites from the perspective of farmers: An example of the Dancong tea culture system in Chaozhou City

作者：常谕[1];孙业红[1,2];杨海龙[3];程佳欣[1];王博杰[2]

第一作者：常谕

机构：[1]北京联合大学旅游学院,北京100101;[2]中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京100101;[3]国家发展和改革委员会国际合作中心,北京100045

第一机构：北京联合大学旅游学院

年份：2023

卷号：45

期号：2

起止页码：428-440

中文期刊名：资源科学

外文期刊名：Resources Science

收录：CSTPCD;;北大核心:【北大核心2020】；CSCD:【CSCD2023_2024】；

基金：国家自然科学基金项目(41971264)。

语种：中文

中文关键词：农业文化遗产地;生态产品;价值实现;旅游参与;农户生计;单丛茶文化系统;潮州

外文关键词：agricultural heritage sites;ecological products;value realization;tourism participation;farmers’livelihoods;Dancong tea culture system;Chaozhou City

摘要：【目的】本文旨在探索农业文化遗产地不同类型农户适合的生态产品旅游价值实现路径,以期为农业文化遗产地生态产品价值实现提供科学依据。【方法】基于广东潮州单丛茶文化系统农户访谈数据,从农户视角构建了旅游价值转化生计资本测量指标体系,运用熵值法评价不同类型农户所持的资本情况,并进一步采用单因素方差分析讨论不同类型农户所持资本之间是否具有显著性差异。【结果】(1)高山种茶区农户参与旅游的优势资本为经济资本和物质资本;低山种茶区F1农户参与旅游的优势资本为自然资本,低山种茶区F2农户参与旅游的优势资本为人力资本和社会文化资本。(2)不同类型农户所持的五大资本中,高山种茶区与低山种茶区农户之间经济资本和物质资本具有显著性差异。(3)高山种茶区与低山种茶区农户可进一步归纳为3种代表性茶类农业文化遗产地农户类型:强经济资本-弱自然资本型、强自然资本-弱经济资本型和强人力资本-强社会文化资本型。从而针对性地提出3条农业文化遗产地生态产品的旅游价值实现路径。【结论】旅游对于实现农业文化遗产的多功能价值、增强遗产的传承利用具有重要作用。遗产地不同类型农户所持生计资本不同,可以通过不同资本组合实现生态产品的旅游价值,从而助力农户更好地实现生态产品的经济效益、增强其生计韧性,促进农户生态保护和遗产保护意识的提升,以经济收益反哺生态系统修复和遗产保护传承。
[Objective]This study explored the paths for different types of farmers in agricultural heritage sites to realize the value of ecological products through tourism,aiming to provide a scientific basis for the realization of ecological product values in agricultural heritage sites.[Methods]Based on the theories of farmer behavior and ecosystem services and using data from 51 semi-structured in-depth interviews through field investigation of the Dancong tea culture system in Chaozhou City of Guangdong Province,and combined with the framework of sustainable livelihood analysis and the ability of community residents to participate in tourism,this study constructed a livelihood capital measurement indicator system for the tourism value realization of ecological products in the agricultural heritage site from the farmers’perspective,which includes 21 secondary indicators.Then,this study used entropy method to evaluate the capital held by different types of farmers,and further discussed whether there are significant differences between the capitals held by different types of farmers by one-way ANOVA.[Results](1)Economic capital and physical capital are the dominant capitals for farmers to participate in tourism in the alpine tea-growing areas.The dominant capital of farmers in the F1 site in low mountain tea-growing areas is natural capital,while the dominant capitals of farmers in the F2 site in low mountain tea-growing areas is human capital and sociocultural capital.(2)Among the five major capitals,there are significant differences in economic capital and physical capital between farmers in high mountain tea-growing areas and low mountain tea-growing areas.With regard to economic capital,there is a significant difference between farmers in high mountain tea-growing areas and the F1 site farmers in low mountain tea-growing areas.In terms of physical capital,the difference between farmers in high mountain tea-growing areas and the F1 site farmers in low mountain tea-growing areas is extremely significant,and the difference between farmers in high mountain tea-growing areas and the F2 site farmers in low mountain tea-growing areas is significant.(3)Farmers in alpine tea-growning areas and low mountain tea-growning areas can be further categorized into three representative types:strong economic capital-weak natural capital,strong natural capital-weak economic capital,and strong human capital-strong sociocultural capital types.According to the characteristics of capital and the level of tourism development,three value realization paths of ecological products of agricultural heritage sites through tourism were proposed.[Conclusion]Tourism plays an important role in realizing the multi-functional value of agricultural heritage and enhancing its inheritance and utilization.Different types of farmers in agricultural heritage sites hold different livelihood capital,so they can realize the tourism value of ecological products through different capital combinations,thus helping farmers to better realize the economic benefits of ecological products,enhance their livelihood resilience,promote farmers'awareness of ecological protection and heritage protection,and feed back ecosystem restoration and heritage protection with economic benefits.