文献类型：期刊文献

英文题名：Cost-benefit analysis on green building energy efficiency technology application: A case in China

作者：Liu, Yuming[1];Guo, Xia[2];Hu, Feiling[3]

第一作者：Liu, Yuming

通讯作者：Liu, YM[1]

机构：[1]Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China;[2]Beijing Union Univ, Coll Biochem Engn, Beijing 100023, Peoples R China;[3]Duquesne Univ, Sch Business, Pittsburgh, PA 15282 USA

第一机构：Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China

通讯机构：[1]corresponding author), Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China.

年份：2014

卷号：82

起止页码：37-46

外文期刊名：ENERGY AND BUILDINGS

收录：;EI(收录号：20143218041744);Scopus(收录号：2-s2.0-84905217308);WOS:【SCI-EXPANDED(收录号:WOS:000343781400004)】；

基金：The first author would like to thank for the support in part from Beijing Planning Project Fund of Philosophy and Social Science (10BaJG368) and Natural Science Foundation of China (71173011). The authors would also like to express great appreciation to professor Sudong Ye from Beijing Jiaotong University, associate professor Pinar Celikkol Geylani from Duquesne University for their sincere help.

语种：英文

外文关键词：Green buildings; Energy efficiency technology application; Cost-benefit evaluation; Incremental costs; Incremental benefits

摘要：In order to initiate economic evaluation of green buildings and foster their development, this article conducts the cost-benefit evaluation of energy efficiency technology application (EETA) on green buildings in China. Based on the economic evaluation theory of construction project (EETCP), the authors first establishes the theoretical framework system of cost-benefit evaluation of the EETA on green buildings and then develops the analysis methods of incremental costs and quantitative calculation formula of incremental benefits of the EETA on green buildings. Using these theories and methods, this article takes the Wanke City project in China as a study case, conducts the cost-benefit empirical analysis of the EETA on green buildings, and draws the following important conclusions: (1) the incremental costs of the EETA account for a large proportion of total incremental costs of green buildings, which are more than 50% in this case; (2) the EETA on green buildings can bring incremental economic benefits, as well as environmental benefits; (3) if only consider the incremental economic benefits of the EETA on green buildings, the financial evaluation indexes show green buildings do not have market investment potential; (4) among all the factors influencing the financial evaluation results of the EETA on green buildings, power price is the most sensitive factor, followed by the unit incremental costs, and the lifetime has the smallest influence. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.