文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：扩招背景下城乡高等教育机会差异研究

英文题名：The Difference of Higher Education Opportunities between Urban and Rural Areas under the College Enrollment Expansion

作者：李莹[1];王琦[2]

第一作者：李莹

机构：[1]中国社会科学院数量经济与技术经济研究所,北京100732;[2]北京联合大学管理学院,北京100101

第一机构：中国社会科学院数量经济与技术经济研究所,北京100732

年份：2023

期号：3

起止页码：77-84

中文期刊名：北京师范大学学报:社会科学版

外文期刊名：Journal of Beijing Normal University(Social Sciences)

收录：CSTPCD;;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;社科基金资助期刊;北大核心:【北大核心2020】；

基金：国家社会科学基金青年项目“城乡居民机会不平等的生成机制、传导效应与应对策略研究”(22CTJ022)。

语种：中文

中文关键词：高等教育机会;城乡差异;高校扩招;可及性;公平性

外文关键词：higher education opportunities;urban-rural differences;college enrollment expansion;accessibility;equity

摘要：本文借鉴机会不公平的“环境-努力”二元分析框架,从可及性、公平性与公平的可及性三个维度量化研究高等教育的城乡差异,并采用不同的分解方法探析背后的成因与机制。研究发现:扩招导致城乡内部高等教育可及性、公平性与公平的可及性不同程度地提高,其中城镇的变动幅度更大,扩招带来的利好更多地被城镇群体捕获,从而进一步拉大了城乡之间的可及性与公平性差距。进一步分析发现,城乡户籍导致的高等教育机会不公平并没有随着扩招的持续出现明显减弱。城乡公平的可及性差异中,扩招带来的规模效应占首位,机会公平改善带来的均等效应次之,环境因素本身的差异带来的结构作用较小则限制了农村居民公平可及性这一综合指标的改善。
Based on the framework of“environment-effort”,this paper quantifies the urban-rural differences from accessibility,equity and equitable accessibility of higher education,and uses different decomposition methods to explore the causes of urban-rural differences.The results have shown that the college enrollment expansion has led to the varying degrees of improvement of the accessibility,equity and equitable accessibility in urban and rural areas.Among them,the change range of urban and rural areas is larger,and the benefits brought by the expansion of college enrollment have better been enjoyed by urban groups,which has further widened the gap between urban-rural accessibility and equity.Further analysis has shown that the inequality of higher education opportunities caused by hukou has not weakened significantly with the continuous college enrollment expansion.The scale effect brought by the expansion of college enrollment has taken the first place,followed by the equalization effect brought by the improvement of opportunity equity.The structural effect brought by the difference of environmental factors themselves is smaller,which has limited the improvement of the comprehensive index of equitable accessibility of rural residents.