登录    注册    忘记密码

详细信息

黄芪水提液分子量分布特征——基于微波辅助法和超声波提取法的对比    

Molecular Weight Distributing of Leguminosae Water Extraction Liquid——Comparative Research by Microwave Extraction and Ultrasonic Wave Extraction

文献类型:期刊文献

中文题名:黄芪水提液分子量分布特征——基于微波辅助法和超声波提取法的对比

英文题名:Molecular Weight Distributing of Leguminosae Water Extraction Liquid——Comparative Research by Microwave Extraction and Ultrasonic Wave Extraction

作者:杨宏伟[1];龚平[1];黄小葳[1]

第一作者:杨宏伟

机构:[1]北京联合大学生物化学工程学院

第一机构:北京联合大学生物化学工程学院

年份:2012

卷号:53

期号:7

起止页码:88-89

中文期刊名:宁夏农林科技

外文期刊名:Ningxia Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Science and Technology

语种:中文

中文关键词:微波辅助提取;超声波提取;分子量分布

外文关键词:Microwave assisted extraction; Ultrasonic wave extraction; Molecular weight distributing

摘要:对比微波辅助法和超声波提取法对黄芪水提液分子量分布特征的影响。结果表明:对于分子量为2 000~50 000的较大物质,微波辅助提取10 min的浸出量是超声辅助提取30 min的14.53倍;对于分子量大于50 000的物质,微波辅助提取10 min的浸出量仅占总浸出物的1.947%,而超声辅助提取50 min为14.933%。因此,微波辅助工艺在较大分子量有效成分的快速浸出和避免无效物质的浸出方面显著优于超声波辅助工艺。
Contrastive experiments of microwave assisted extraction(MAE) and ultrasonic wave technology were carried out to analyze the effect of the different kinds of extraction technology on the characteristics of molecular weight distributing of solute in Leguminosae water extraction liquid.Results indicated that extracts with molecular weight 2 000-50 000 Dalton at 10 minutes by MAE technology was 14.53 times of that at 30 minutes by ultrasonic wave extraction;extracts with molecular weight bigger than 50 000 Dalton was 1.947% of total extracts at 10 minutes by MAE technology,but it was 14.933% of that at 50 minutes by ultrasonic wave extraction.Therefore,MAE technology was obviously better than ultrasonic wave technology on the fast extraction of valid components with bigger molecular weight and avoiding of invalid extracts.

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

版权所有©北京联合大学 重庆维普资讯有限公司 渝B2-20050021-8 
渝公网安备 50019002500408号 违法和不良信息举报中心