文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：京津冀城市群城际高速铁路建设对可达性及空间公平的影响

英文题名：The impact of intercity high-speed railway construction on accessibility and spatial equity in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration

作者：侯艺曼[1];何丹[1];孟斌[1];李启萌[1];陈静[1];龙海麟[1]

第一作者：侯艺曼

机构：[1]北京联合大学应用文理学院,北京100191

第一机构：北京联合大学应用文理学院

年份：2026

卷号：54

期号：3

起止页码：12-24

中文期刊名：陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版)

外文期刊名：Journal of Shaanxi Normal University:Natural Science Edition

收录：;北大核心:【北大核心2023】；

基金：北京联合大学校级科研项目(ZK20202405);北京市社会科学基金重点项目(19JDGLA006);国家自然科学基金(41201115)。

语种：中文

中文关键词：城际高速铁路;影响;可达性;空间公平;京津冀城市群

外文关键词：intercity high-speed railway;impact;accessibility;spatial equity;Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration

摘要：高速铁路的建设和发展有助于减少旅行时间,而其是否有助于城市群内部可达性水平分布的平衡,对空间公平的影响是值得关注的问题。研究将2016—2030年京津冀城际铁路中长期规划设定为3个阶段,使用各类路网数据和社会经济数据,对各个阶段的可达性进行测度;利用城市平均旅行时间来评价其可达性变化,并通过可达性离散指数和领土凝聚力指数来衡量空间公平的变化。结果表明,城际高速铁路的建设显著提高了城市可达性和区域潜在联系。2016—2023年,市级层面的城市之间旅行时间平均减少了33.1%,县级层面则平均减少了20.7%;2023—2030年市级层面可达性提高9.5%,县级层面提高10.2%,主要侧重于加强首都地区周边城市的连通。区域内市级层面公平性和凝聚力得到增强,而县级层面公平性趋于极化。国家和地方政府应在不同规划层面考虑政策和协调措施,以进一步促进空间发展和区域平等。
While the development of high-speed rail(HSR)has notably reduced travel time,its implications for equitable accessibility within urban clusters and spatial equity remain critical concerns.The study divides the medium-term and long-term intercity railway initiatives in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban into three phases from 2016 to 2030.Using road network datasets and socio-economic indicators,accessibility is analyzed through the average travel time,while spatial equity is evaluated using the accessibility dispersion index and the territorial cohesion index.The results indicate that the intercity HSR network substantially improves accessibility and strengthens regional connectivity at the municipal level.From 2016 to 2023,average intercity travel time decreases by 33.1%at the municipal level and 20.7%at the county level.From 2023 to 2030,accessibility increases by 9.5%at the municipal level and 10.2%at the county level,with a primary emphasis on improving the city connectivity in the capital region.Spatial equity and cohesion within the region are enhanced at the municipal level,whereas equity at the county level tends to polarization.The study recommends that both national and local governments should consider policies and coordination measures at different planning levels to promote spatial development and regional equity.