文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：中国证券监管者非理性行为关联性研究

英文题名：Relationship Research on Irrational Behaviors of Chinese Securities Regulators

作者：郝旭光[1];于海娇[2];张士玉[3]

第一作者：郝旭光

机构：[1]对外经济贸易大学国际商学院;[2]斯伦贝谢中国公司;[3]北京联合大学管理学院

第一机构：对外经济贸易大学国际商学院,北京100029

年份：2012

期号：3

起止页码：80-86

中文期刊名：北京工商大学学报：社会科学版

收录：CSTPCD;;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2011】；CSSCI:【CSSCI2012_2013】；

基金：国家社会科学基金项目"中国资本市场监管有效性研究"(05BJL028);国家社会科学基金项目"我国资本市场系统稳定性评估和监测研究"(11AZD010)

语种：中文

中文关键词：证券监管者;自我服务偏见;后视偏见;推卸责任效应

外文关键词：securities regulator;self-serving bias;hindsight bias;accountability resistance

摘要：通过对证券监管部门进行问卷调研,并结合统计学中列联表的Kendall相关分析方法,对监管者自我服务偏见、后视偏见和推卸责任效应进行分析,检验监管者的自我服务偏见和后视偏见之间、后视偏见和推卸责任效应之间以及推卸责任效应和后视偏见之间的关联性。研究发现,监管者存在不同程度的自我服务偏见、后视偏见和推卸责任效应,且这三者之间两两存在关联。监管者应认识到自身存在的非理性认知偏差,并且在纠正这些偏差时注意不同偏差之间的关联。
Through the survey research on securities regulators and combined with the method of Kendall relationship analysis,this paper analyzes the securities regulators’ self-serving bias,hindsight bias and accountability resistance effect to test the relationship between self-serving bias and hindsight bias,between self-serving bias and accountability resistance as well as between hindsight bias and accountability resistance.It has found that to some degree,regulators have self-serving bias,hindsight bias and accountability resistance and there is relationship between every two.The conclusion is that regulators should be aware of their own irrational cognition bias and pay attention to the relationship between different biases while avoiding these biases.