文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：黑格尔论经验哲学——对《小逻辑》“经验主义”一节的解读

英文题名：Hegel's Interpretation of Philosophical Empiricism

作者：高惠芳[1]

第一作者：高惠芳

机构：[1]北京联合大学人文社科部

第一机构：北京联合大学马克思主义学院

年份：2015

卷号：0

期号：6

起止页码：70-75

中文期刊名：北京行政学院学报

外文期刊名：Journal of Beijing Administrative College

收录：CSTPCD;;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2014】；CSSCI:【CSSCI2014_2016】；

基金：国家社会科学基金一般项目(15BKS019);北京市社科联青年社科人才资助项目(2015SKL021);南疆教育发展研究中心重大项目(XJEDU070114A03)

语种：中文

中文关键词：黑格尔;小逻辑;经验;马克思;感性活动

外文关键词：Hegel;Logic; experience; Marx; sensuous activity

摘要：纵观已有的对黑格尔《小逻辑》的解读,学者们关注的焦点是抽象的思辨逻辑的演绎过程。这一过程中,黑格尔的经验世界则被其哲学逻辑所荫蔽。黑格尔在针对旧形而上学、唯物主义、康德批判哲学的批判中,阐明了自然界作为抽象的思维的外化物,不仅不能作为思维的起点,而且不能有效证明思维的理性原则的论点。这也表明了黑格尔的经验世界的本质。作为对以德国古典哲学为代表的意识形态的批判,马克思从正反两方面阐述了黑格尔的经验观,为他的科学的历史的感性活动奠定了基础,进而开创了历史的科学——历史唯物主义。
Throughout the existing interpretation of Hegel＇s Logic, scholars＇ attentions are paid to the deductive process of abstract and speculative logic, in which Hegel＇s world of experience and his philosophical world is ambiguous. In the chapter of empiricism of Logic, against the old metaphysics, the materialism and Kant＇s critical philosophy, Hegel pointed out that, Nature, as an externalization of abstract thinking, not only cannot be a starting point of thinking, but not cannot effectively prove the rational principle of thinking, which illustrated the nature of Hegel＇s world of experience. For criticizing the ideology underlain by German classical philosophy, Marx explained the pros and cons of the Hegelian concept of experience, laid the foundation for his scientific, historical and sensuous activity and thus create his science of history-Historical Materialism.