文献类型：期刊文献

英文题名：Group Decision-Making Method of Entry Policy During a Pandemic

作者：Cui, Chunsheng[1];Li, Baiqiu[1];Chen, Xianfeng[2]

第一作者：Cui, Chunsheng

通讯作者：Chen, XF[1]

机构：[1]Henan Univ Econ & Law, Coll Comp & Informat Engn, Zhengzhou 450046, Peoples R China;[2]Beijing Union Univ, Tourism Coll, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China

第一机构：Henan Univ Econ & Law, Coll Comp & Informat Engn, Zhengzhou 450046, Peoples R China

通讯机构：[1]corresponding author), Beijing Union Univ, Tourism Coll, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.|[1141732]北京联合大学旅游学院;[11417]北京联合大学;

年份：2024

卷号：29

期号：1

起止页码：56-65

外文期刊名：TSINGHUA SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

收录：;EI(收录号：20233614674511);Scopus(收录号：2-s2.0-85169503300);WOS:【SCI-EXPANDED(收录号:WOS:001074356700005)】；

基金：This study was supported by the Key Scientific Research Project of Henan Province (Nos. 22A630004 and 21A790002) and the 2021 Project of Huamao Finance Research Institute of Henan University of Economics and Law and the Key Fields Special Project (Digital Economy)of Guangdong Universities (No. 2021ZDZX3010).

语种：英文

外文关键词：COVID-19; Epidemics; Pandemics; Databases; Decision making; Stakeholders; Strain; epidemic prevention and control; group decision-making; alternative ranking; control policy

摘要：Omicron, the new mutant coronavirus, has spread rapidly globally, attracting close attention from different stakeholders worldwide. The complex and constantly changing epidemic situation has had a new impact on the world. Therefore, this paper focuses on the characteristics of the rapid spread of the COVID-19 variant strain. Generally, epidemic prevention experts conduct preliminary screening as part of the existing epidemic plan database according to the current local situation, after which they sort the alternatives deemed more suitable for the situation. Then the decision-makers identify the most divergent expert group, plan for consultation and adjustments, and finally obtain the plan with the smallest divergence. This article aims to integrate the experts' opinions with the method of minimizing the differences, which can maximize the expert consensus and help organize the schemes that best meet the epidemic situation. The experts' negotiation and iteration of the differences in the initial plan align with the current complex and dynamic epidemic situation and are of great significance to the rapid formulation of plans to achieve effective prevention and control.