文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：视觉障碍大学生《经络学》课程试卷考核质量评价

英文题名：Evaluation on Test Paper Quality of Meridians Theory Curriculum for College Students with Visual Impairments

作者：边丽[1];姜春梅[1];张海丛[1];黄晓红[1];刘峰[1]

第一作者：边丽

机构：[1]北京联合大学特殊教育学院

第一机构：北京联合大学特殊教育学院

年份：2007

期号：12

起止页码：43-46

中文期刊名：中国特殊教育

外文期刊名：Chinese Journal of Special Education

收录：CSTPCD;;北大核心:【北大核心2004】；CSSCI:【CSSCI2006_2007】；

语种：中文

中文关键词：质量评价;信度;效度;难度;区分度

外文关键词：quality evaluation reliability validity degree of difficulty distinguishability

摘要：研究目的:对考试试卷和考试的质量进行分析,了解教师的教学质量和学生的学习情况,为教学管理提供反馈信息,同时及时发现教学和课程考核中存在的问题,以便总结经验、改进教学及课程考核方法。方法:运用教育测量学方法,对北京联合大学特殊教育学院2004级针灸推拿学专业(本科视障学生)经络学课程期末考试进行了试卷的信度、效度、难度、区分度和考试成绩分析。结果显示:此次考试信度可靠性尚可,效度良好,试卷难度偏易,区分度良好,学生考试成绩为近似正态分布,考试较全面、客观地评价了学生对课程知识的掌握程度。
Objective：To learn teachers＇ teaching quality and students＇ learning so as to provide feedback for teaching administration as well as finding out existing problems in teaching and curriculum evaluation in time in order to improve teaching methods and curriculum evaluation through analyzing test paper and quality of test. Method ： This research adopts methods of educational assessment to analyze reliability, validity, degree of difficulty, distinguishability and test scores of final exam paper of meridians theory curriculum for college students with visual impairments whose major are acupuncture and massage enrolled in 2004 in Special Education School of Beijing Union University. Results：The test has adequate reliability, good validity, low difficulty and sound distinguishability. Students＇ academic performance is near normal distribution, and the test assesses students＇ mastery of curriculum knowledge in a relatively comprehensive and objective way.